cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9799372

What’s Meta up to?

  1. Embrace ActivityPub, , Mastodon, and the fediverse

  2. Extend ActivityPub, Mastodon, and the fediverse with a very-usable app that provides additional functionality (initially the ability to follow everybody you’re following on Instagram, and to communicate with all Threads users) that isn’t available to the rest of the fediverse – as well over time providing additional services and introducing incompatibilities and non-standard improvements to the protocol

  3. Exploit ActivityPub, Mastodon, and the fediverse by utilizing them for profit – and also using them selfishly for Meta’s own ends

Since the fediverse is so much smaller than Threads, the most obvious ways of exploiting it – such as stealing market share by getting people currently in the fediverse to move to Threads – aren’t going to work. But exploitation is one of Meta’s core competences, and once you start to look at it with that lens, it’s easy to see some of the ways even their initial announcement and tiny first steps are exploiting the fediverse: making Threads feel like a more compelling platform, and reshaping regulation. Longer term, it’s a great opportunity for Meta to explore – and maybe invest in – shifting their business model to decentralized surveillance capitalism.

    • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yet another word that starts with an E! Thanks for the link, I added a link to the post near the end of the “Extinguish isn’t the only word that starts with an E”:

      Either way, as Ramin Honary suggests, it’s a great opportunity for Enshittification – yet another word that starts with an E!

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the plan for the fedivers is to associate with Meta, I will leave it in a heart beat.

  • LoveSausage@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    As i suggested from the start. Defederate any instance that federate with threads. Yea I’m being Trotsky here, split can be a good thing.

    • Doctor xNo@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, it makes me sad that we would have to, but that doesn’t make me agree less that it would be necessary to keep a real alternative in existence.

      Every instance that allows Meta should not be considered part of the Fediverse anymore, but is now Metaverse. Mastodon/Pleroma/Lemmy/… will then just become the running software, but not by default ‘Fediverse’ anymore, that choice will become the admin’s: Fedi or Meta.

      In a perfect world we can still keep the big parties out for those that choose to, though at first it will be hard, not only to keep up with instances leaking both ways, but also hard to let go of the unrelated users that had no choice in the matter and are now presented with: change server or follow the server’s choice, and the second choice will be the least trouble for most. In other words: many followers will be lost and many currently followed won’t be reachable anymore.

    • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep, I’ve said for a while that if a schism with transitive defederation happens, it’ll be a good thing. There are many fediverses!

  • AnxiousDuck@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    What I really hope is that the fediverse doesn’t end up in a fragmented mess trying to catch up with Meta’s eventual extension of ActivityPub… What this project needs is a slow and steady (technological) development driven by the communities instead of trying to fit in with the big players. That’s what really did harm XMPP too IMHO.

    • beetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      My understanding of how xmpp has progressed is exactly what you think ActivityPub needs. Xmpp is still alive and still continuing to drive for further technological standards and classification.

      Google essentially dropped xmpp b/c it was such a slow progressing standard that was focused entirely on the technological progress and that march towards standardization and specification.

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The best paragraph is at the very bottom

    speaking of Bannon and his pals, since far right social networks Gab and Truth Social are built on ActivityPub, if Threads opens up two-way federation as planned later this year they’d have a golden opportunity to try to build on the Trump campaign’s successful work with Facebook on digital voter suppression in 2016, the “Stop the Steal” and coup planning in 2020, and QAnon conspiracy theory as well as Libs of Tik Tok and Moms for Liberty’s work. What could possibly go wrong?

  • Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well, threads dot net is already fully blocked on my pleroma instance, like it doesn’t exist.

    Any other urls I should maybe add to keep the big culprits out?

  • Kayn@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    I stopped reading when I saw a copy-pasted definition of the word “exploit”.

    This article thinks we’re dumb as shit.

    • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I didn’t have that in the original draft, and half the people who reviewed it said “I don’t understand what you mean by exploit”. And no, I don’t think people reading the article are dumb as shit, I assume that most people who already know what exploit means are intelligent enough to skip over the four lines of cut-and-paste text and read the rest of the article.

    • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s a great article. I linked to it in the OP:

      The same is true with Google’s adoption and then abandonment of the XMPP protocol, which is also often described as EEE. I don’t think that’s the right way to look at it; for one thing, XMPP is still around, and thanks to adoption by Zoom and others it has hundreds of millions of users – or billions, if you count WhatsApp’a non-standard derivative version. But in any case, whether or not it was EEE, Google didn’t go into it with a goal of killing XMPP. They just wanted to exploit XMPP to address a business problem of making Google Talk successful – and did so, until it wasn’t useful to them any more.

  • gerdesj@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Chill mate. This is the fedi - you get to actively allow or deny what you see.

    No-one can take that away from you.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can mastadon hosts just refuse to federate with activepub? (I’m probably misunderstanding everything here but hopefully you get my drift).

    • bogdugg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Assuming you mean “Can Mastodon instances defederate with Threads?”: Yes. Mastodon (and similar services) run on the ActivityPub protocol, which allows them to decide who they do and do not federate with. Many instances have chosen to preemptively block Threads, many have chosen not to. Pick what works for you.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Meta can’t even keep Facebook or Instagram functional. They get worse with literally every single update. New things are broken every time I visit. They need to take care of what they have, not go looking for other things to fucking ruin. Stupid-ass anti-trust pig dogs.

    • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not a typo but I see what you mean, I meant that it has a lot fewer people in it but it’s not great wording and I’ll fix it. Thanks!

      • library_napper@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        How many people are on Threads? I don’t get it, theres wayy more people on the fediverse than Threads, no?

        • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, Meta claims that Threads has 100 million monthly active users, the fediverse as a whole has 1.4 - 1.7 million depending on whose statistics you use. Even if they’re exaggerating, it’s still much got a lot more users.

            • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              When people say “Fediverse”, it’s almost always in reference to federated social media. In other words: email doesn’t count.

              • thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Exactly. XMPP has hundreds of millions of users too (billions of you count WhatsApp’s non-standard version) and Matrix has close to 100 million but we don’t consider them part of the fediverse either.

  • jcrabapple@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    The ignorance and fear mongering around this topic is astonishing. Look at all the facts. It’s pretty clear what’s happening here and why it’s happening, and it’s not EEE. The whole point of federation and decentralization is that it can’t be “extinguished”. Threads can come and go and it won’t matter. The fediverse will still be here. Block it if you want but I’ll not be blocking it on my instance. I’ll let my users decide for themselves.