How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

  • clemdemort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s the easiest solution to packaging software for Linux that doesn’t mean it’s good, In fact fhe way no dependencies are shared absolutely wrecks my hard drive and makes everything super long (downloading, updating, etc…).

    Where it shines is security but to be honest do you really need an open source app to be in it’s own secure sandbox?

    I vastly prefer nix and I wish packaging stuff for it was easier.

        • rsolva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I never notice any update times, as the default in Fedora is to auto-update (I think?). Everything is just always up to date.

          Edit: coming from ten years of Arch, this has significantly reduced my time fixing things related to an update 😆

          • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah I disabled those because my Internet is shit. I’m also on fedora and when I update, the 3 flatpak apps that I have installed take as long as my entire system to update. But I get it doesn’t make much of a difference if it just happens in the background