I thought I’d chuck windows on my gaming laptop an Acer nitro 5 from last year, to see how it’s going do some bits I can’t on Linux VR, certain multiplayer games etc.

What a disaster! I’ve spent the whole day brute forcing drivers and generally dicking about trying to get my setup sorted.

Upon installation, Wi-Fi drivers don’t exist, so you cannot use the internet while installing if you’re on Wi-Fi. Mint’s had this since what 2006? But that’s cool, Cortana is here to chat away and not understand any requests. Once finally in the OS after 20 questions that could be considered harassment if it was a person, nothing was ready to go. Every single driver needed sourcing and installing.

People have the cheek to complain about Linux’s Nvidia install, literally two clicks on most distros if it isn’t already baked in. Go to website find driver, download click click click agree click wait more software click click wait.

Plug in my sound card OK it’s a bit old now UA-25 but nothing happens…hmm find obscure video partially install a driver from Vista then cancel the installation program so you can side load a driver from 8,1 but wait there’s more disable core isolation to allow the driver to work reboot into a now slightly more compromised OS.

OK plug in wheel again not new stuff G25 oh it works cool. Oh, no H-shifter OK download driver. “Can’t find device, ensure it’s plugged in”. Windows decided it knew better, downloaded its own driver that blocks the official one and loads a steering wheel as a gamepad…GG cool cool.

I do not understand why we still have this image that Windows is noob friendly, it’s such a convoluted obfuscated process to do anything. It does worse than nothing, it thinks it’s smart enough to carry out tasks on the user behalf and just bork it.

All of these issues are because I don’t have the new shiny things, but it really highlighted why I love Linux now if you’ll excuse me I’m going to install a distro and play on my 20-year-old peripherals

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wi-Fi drivers don’t exist

    They absolutely exist, but perhaps isn’t part of the installer.

    Every single driver needed sourcing and installing.

    Windows Update solves 95% of that automatically these days, as long as you have internet it will sort it out for you.

    Plug in my sound card OK it’s a bit old now UA-25 but nothing happens.

    This an external USB sound card from 2004, Roland has drivers for it working on Windows 98/ME/XP/2000/Vista/7/8/8.1 it is a 20 year old card, it awesome that it works on Linux, but you can’t blame Roland or Microsoft for not supporting a 20 year old device on the latest versions of the OS.

    OK plug in wheel again not new stuff G25 oh it works cool. Oh, no H-shifter OK download driver. “Can’t find device, ensure it’s plugged in”. Windows decided it knew better, downloaded its own driver that blocks the official one and loads the steering wheel as a gamepad…GG cool cool.

    You are whining about a modern OS not being compatible with a 18 year old steering wheel? You can’t expect indefinite hardware support for every random little device you happen to find, this like the sound card above is on you, not Microsoft.

    I do not understand why we still have this image that Windows is noob friendly.

    None of the above quoted examples are noob issues, this is like you are talking to a person in old english from the mideval times and being mad that a random guy in the middle of Londing in 2024 can’t understand you.

    A noob would realize that their devices were too old and buy new devices.

    Windows is noob friendly in that most software have a Windows version, most people use it, it is a known variable.

    Like it or not, Windows is the defacto standard, and that means that is it safe in the perspective of a noob user.

    I am saying all of this as an IT guy who has worked professionally with both Linux and Windows, I ran Linux as my main OS for a year or two, I LIKE Linux, but this is not fair critisism of Windows.

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      you can’t blame Roland or Microsoft for not supporting a 20 year old device on the latest versions of the OS.

      Why not?

      You can’t expect indefinite hardware support for every random little device you happen to find, this like the sound card above is on you, not Microsoft.

      Why not? Linux development is mostly volunteer, and these things are easily compatible with Linux. It seems like you can absolutely expect support for every device, it’s just that Microsoft isn’t willing to provide it.

      None of the above quoted examples are noob issues, this is like you are talking to a person in old english from the mideval times and being mad that a random guy in the middle of Londing in 2024 can’t understand you.

      Notice that you had to exaggerate a 20 year timespan into a 500 year timespan to make this analogy work?

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why not?

        Because it is a paid OS and it’s developers are writing code for financial gain, if they are not being paid to write the code, it doesn’t get written.

        Voulenteers write the code because they want or need to, if there are no drivers for a device in on Linux, you need to write it yourself.

        Notice that you had to exaggarate a 20 year timespan into a 500 year timespan to make thisnanalogy work?

        Yes, that was deliberate. Have you ever noticed how much faster technology develops compared to languages? That is why the analogy works.

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The analogy doesn’t even work if we ignore the massive difference in time scale. Languages develop organically, they are not managed. Comparing a managed and developed system and a twenty year timespan to an organic language system over a five hundred year timespan is just ridiculous.

          Because it is a paid OS and it’s developers are writing code for financial gain, if they are not being paid to write the code, it doesn’t get written.

          They are being paid to write the code. Microsoft is just choosing which code they should write, and it doesn’t include any old devices because they want you to buy new devices.

          It’s perfectly reasonable to expect compatibility, and lay blame when there isn’t any. Microsoft simply doesn’t provide it.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I disagree with you, but don’t have the energy to keep arguing, this argument has been going on for days, and I made my point back on day one.

        • sawne128 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because it is a paid OS and it’s developers are writing code for financial gain,

          No shit. But that only explains why Windows is bad. It doesn’t mean that Windows isn’t bad. We shouldn’t give Windows pity points just because poor Billy Gates is addicted to money.

    • sawne128 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ridicolous. You act like this is the first person to realise Windows is jank. How many USB steering wheels have you bought during your lifetime?

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        None, I was gifted a Sidewinder Forcefeedback steering wheel by my dad when I was 8-9 something, but it used the old gameport.

        I don’t see how this is relevant though…

    • tritonium@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Windows is still fucking ass though and it’s so bad that I can not respect the opinion of someone that claims they are an IT professional and don’t main Linux. Like what? And what does that even mean, that’s ridiculously broad, what do you do? I’m a network engineer and sysadmin.

      Linux is objectively superior to Windows in almost every way. It has vastly superior workflows. It’s more customizable. It’s insanely more efficient. It’s more secure. I feel like I’m wading through 3ft of shit anytime I boot into Windows. Not to mention the ability to actually have ownership of your computer. And that’s just talking about the ways Linux is better. That’s not getting into why Windows is ass like… telemetry data and ads in the OS and configs reverting from updates and the dumbass way software is installed on it and how shit docker runs in it and I can go on and on. The workflows of Windows are actual dog ass and literally every single popular Linux DE has better workflows and customization.

      If you in IT and use Windows for anything other than a gaming machine or something like Photoshop, then I don’t want you anywhere near my tech.

    • caustictrap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Happy to see lemmy linux community not blindly hating windows and providing facts. Also you can use a package manager like choco to install apps from terminal so you dont have deal with clicking next.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Treating Windows unfairly in these kinds of comparisons is a disservice to Linux as it implies that Linux can’t win in a fair comparison.

        Windows/Linux/MacOS are all best at different things and for different persons, let the best OS for the task and person win on a fair test

        • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Treating Windows unfairly? Blindly hating Windows? Microsoft is a corporation designed to MAKE DOLLAZ SON. They aren’t your unfairly treated friend who wants to make sure you have an amazing gaming experience. They are part of a corporate duopoly. Meaning…dun dun dun - One of two shite options. I don’t include Linux in this because it is the exact opposite of this market dominance. It is a free market of choice - which you can choose to better by contributing code, monetarily, or promotional support.

          Windows is actively user hostile, actively contributing to planned obsolecence, and overall an ad infested spyware pile of bloated inefficient garbage.

          As an IT Professional you should have first hand experience of the waste that comes from technological churn.

          Linux standing alone on it own merits… Yeah right. Linux standing up against hundreds of millions of dollars spent in PR, Advertising, and the business practice of embrace, extend, and extinguish. You want better shit? Be a part of a community instead of brainlessly buying a solution.

          OP - I salute you and your 20 year old peripherals. At least you are creatively making something you have work rather than buying shit that causes more problems.

          I will happily shill for the Linux project and any other open source project - for volunteers trying to make something they want to use.

            • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, you are probably right. I apologize. The tone was meant to add to the point not make it unreadable. I stand by the points I was trying to make but I agree the tone is off putting to some.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Microsoft is a corporation designed to MAKE DOLLAZ SON

            Yeah? Most companies are designed to make money, is it wrong to want to earn money?

            Oh and I am not your son, please don’t refer to me as such.

            OP - I salute you and your 20 year old peripherals. At least you are creatively making something you have work rather than buying shit that causes more problems.

            To me it sounds like OP had the stuff working on Linux and decided to try Windows, then when some random 20 year old device didn’t work decided to bash Windows to hell and back.

            This is like the bicycle meme where OP is biking fine, stops, puts a Windows pipe in the spokes and blames Windows for his issues when he falls over.

            This is not being creative to find a way to keep using his devices, they were working, this is not being creative to find a way to do what he wanted to do on Linux, this is going back to the standard recipie with 20 year old ingerdients and expecting to make a beautiful and tasty cake and complaining when it tastes like rot.

    • beatle@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s concerning that you think “just buy new stuff” is reasonable and that Windows should only work on new hardware out of the box.

      • mindlight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s concerning that you insinuate that 20 year old hardware just works in Linux.

        Just because a 20 year old sound card happens to work in your favorite Linux distro doesn’t in any way mean that it will work forever or that there are drivers for all 20 year old soundcards.

        Where does it say that it’s not allowed to create a Windows driver for a 20 year old soundcard?

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is the reality of the computer industry, you don’t have to like it, but you have to expect it and work within the reality of the industry.

        If OP had complained about how their 10 or 5 year old devices didn’t work, then they might have had a point, but 20 years old? That is unresonable.

        • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, the reality of the computer industry is that the industry changes. That has quite the dual meaning. I want it to mean it changes for the better…ahem…Open Source

          If people want to use a working twenty year old device, it is completely reasonable to complain that Windows doesn’t allow that - because that is where Linux STANDS ON ITS OWN MERITS

          • accideath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            And still, it is usually possible to get the 20 y/o hardware to run in windows. It might need a bit of trickery but in essence, windows has changed so little under the hood, in the last 20 years…

            Recently I acquired a 20 year old film scanner. I had the choice of either buying a new third party scanner software for 100€ or just get the old one working. I found some script that made the old driver identify as something newer and it installed without a problem and has been working since. (Or rather it has worked until recently, when I switched to linux anyways because I want to use the pc for gaming exclusively, since for work related stuff, I have a Mac)

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You forget that he’s an “IT guy that has worked with Linux and Windows professionally”. Trust him, bro!

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am NOT going to post my business card or link my LinkedIn to win an internet argument, I have shown that OPs complaints are unresonable expectations, that was my goal.

          • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You’re sure allowed to think you did, and sure as hell I don’t care about your alleged IT professional background. Just like you say that Windows is noob friendly, I say Windows is NOT friendly, period. The OP makes a great case on yet another reason why Windows is complete and utter crap, and I’m an IT guy that has worked with Linux and Windows professionally. I HATE Windows. I’m not sending my business card either, and I know better than to have a LinkedIn profile. That’s hould be enough to tell us apart.

            • accideath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Windows is noob friendly. If you do what noobs do and just buy an off the shelf PC and don’t think about stuff like drivers at all. Now, Linux isn’t much less noob friendly in those cases and just primarily suffers from lack of system integrators using it and, to a much lesser degree, from a lack of software.

            • Dumpdog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Linkedin. How to tell me you’re not linked in by telling me you’re Linkedin.