nutomic@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikiexternal-linkmessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikinutomic@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square123fedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
minus-squareSanndyTheManndy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·4 months agoFinally. Hope this takes off and breaks wikipedia’s biased monopoly on knowledge.
minus-squarefigaro@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoIdk man I’d say wikipedia is probably 95% great. The political stuff will always have it’s issues, sure, but most of it is quite good info. I’m all for competition though. I hope this one takes off as well.
minus-squarejackpot@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months ago‘biased monopoly’ what are you talking about, everything is sourced and open
minus-squareThe Snark Urge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYou can get specific about certain articles needing improvement, but to call all of Wikipedia generally biased without any proof seems like a pretty red lil flag
Finally. Hope this takes off and breaks wikipedia’s biased monopoly on knowledge.
Idk man I’d say wikipedia is probably 95% great. The political stuff will always have it’s issues, sure, but most of it is quite good info.
I’m all for competition though. I hope this one takes off as well.
‘biased monopoly’ what are you talking about, everything is sourced and open
You can get specific about certain articles needing improvement, but to call all of Wikipedia generally biased without any proof seems like a pretty red lil flag