• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’d think businesses wouldn’t want to give all their communications to… a bigger business, especially one currently invested in AI training.

    It would be like a company doing mapping/GIS stuff using Gmail for communications. You’re just handing your data over to your largest competitor. It’s fucking stupid.

    • explore_broaden@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      When you’re an enterprise client paying serious money for the service, there are often data protection requirements. They have the capability to support things like export controlled information or HIPAA compliance in office, and appropriate legal agreements ensuring data protection. It’s the power of collective bargaining (they are buying 100s++ licenses instead of just one).

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. If it’s a regulated industry, they’re not just paying for Teams. They’re paying for someone else to worry about meeting certain compliance requirements and take the heat if things go wrong. I’m not sure how many companies besides Microsoft can offer that. At most it’s a fraction of the available options.

    • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’ve clearly not worked in enterprise recently. Everything is about the Cloud, AI, and reducing Opex spending currently.