• traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

      Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

      All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

    • traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

      Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

      All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

    • traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

      Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

      All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

    • traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

      Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

      All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

    • traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me what you’re describing is communism, sorry.

      Being able to own a private vehicle it’s, in my opinion, a fundamental part of freedom of movement. Sure, public transportation should also exist, but should be the option not the rule.

      All cities should have specific places for bikers, I agree with that, you should be able to move whatever you want. Being anti private vehicles it’s commie for me.

    • traveler01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry but you’re just passing the same leftist propaganda, that all would be fixed if you took the cars from people. Cars are a fundamental part of freedom of movement and taking them shouldn’t and isn’t the solution for anything at all.

      High density zones are just symptom of the city being overcrowded, and for that there’s really no solution. Public transportation, biking lanes, should existing should be the rule, not a bandaid for the fact that the city you live is overcrowded or its design is utter garbage.