• db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      7 months ago

      All it would take is someone getting AWS blacklisted for an hour, that law would disappear like it never existed.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Hahahahaha

    Unintended consequences - what are they going to do once 90% of connections are encrypted, include use of VPNs and encrypted DNS?

    This is what they’re promoting.

    Host your own encrypted DNS on a VPS in a non-compliant location, use a VPN to connect to it.

    So many ways these idiots are cutting their own throats.

    Also, let’s list the companies rather than say “Movie Industry”. Or let that be a link to a Wiki article listing all the companies and their holdings.

    Fuck em all at this point. I go to maybe 2 movies a year, at most. And I’m cutting subscription services, down to 2 at this point.

    • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      As a guy from Russia, I must admit that vpns are not a big problem for censors. They can be easily blocked, including self-hosted ones by protocol detection. And DNS would not do much with IP and clienthello-based blocks. And most users are not enough tech-savvy to constantly switch to new protocols as old ones get blocked.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You have no rights in Russia.

        VPNs can’t be categorically banned in the US without major first amendment issues. It’s not a huge technical issue, but unless the courts just throw out the Constitution (a risk that we’re seeing too much of, but still a meaningful bar to cross), there are huge legal barriers to doing so.

        Your government doesn’t need to care about legal barriers because you have a dictator who can act unilaterally.

        • RedFox@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          We are just a little behind trying to elect our new dictator…

          But just for a day…

          /S 🙄

        • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          VPNs are not categorically banned in Russia either. Just 95% of them. Categorical ban is not actually required here. Government can just create licensing procedure and license only those VPNs, which follow “rules”. I do not see how this is different from ISP bans.

      • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        CBaaS

        Censorship Bypass as a Service, where your new updates are your [unique user ID].com

        Let us manage your bypass for you! Payable in crypto or cash.

    • dumbass@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have found and become a big fan of tv shows that I would have never had the chance to see because of piracy, one of my favourite shows ‘Corner Gas’ never once aired in my home country. Thank you piracy for helping me find good entertainment.

      • akakunai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Never thought a single non-canadian would have even heard of Corner Gas lol

        • dumbass@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I absolutely love it, it’s the perfect show in my opinion, I’m so glad I stumbled across it.

          I was sold on it by the first episode entirely because of Oscar, he kills me with every line.

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Legally guaranteed corporate profits, with enforcement funded by taxpayers.

    We should abolish this practice.

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah. This is socialism… if there’s one group that hates socialism. Meh. We know they support this.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The parasites that keep the money aren’t the “movie industry”, the people who actually work to make the movies are.

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 months ago

    an industry which throws away finished movies because they don’t want to spend the money to release it?

    yeah nah, you’re disqualified from an opinion on piracy.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 months ago

    I still don’t understand why they keep going after piracy when it is a symptom of the bigger problem. Movies today are expensive and often made inaccessible through BS digital services that periodically just make films and TV unavailable to save server space or avoid paying for licensing.

    I would guess that the vast majority of people are not pirating content. I’d also guess that if digital providers and studios would actually try to change the distribution model that allows customers to buy content that is later turned off on a whim, they would see meaningful change in piracy activity.

    • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because piracy is the boogieman that allows them to wrestle more power and profit from everyone around them like the parasites they are. They want a cut every time anyone ever watches something, ever. And they want to control if you even have the option of what to watch.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Once Neuralink’s installed adn they start selling off our thoughts to information collection bureaus, they’re gonna want us to pay a license for everytime we think about someting not in the public domain

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    I would propose a law that states " All companies must keep their data away from the Internet. If the data ends up in the Internet then it’s up for grabs by anyone"

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Half a year later, additional categories are added for CSAM. And another year later for illegal copies and cracks. All the while some states openly missuse it against porn and abortion. We know that game already!

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      But did you even think of the children?

      Sounds like you just want to hurt those precious little ones.

      How dare you!!! /s

  • tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it’s that big a deal go after the service providers for the servers, this type of shit just makes inhibiting free speech easier.

    If I don’t want people using Truth Social I guess making a bunch of accounts to share torrent links would be enough to shut it down?

    The MPAA still has never been able to demonstrate that privacy even has actual impacts on movie and ticket sales… When Netflix was super convenient and had a lot of content piracy went down. Turns out splitting to dozens of streaming services made it difficult enough that people just went back to sailing the high seas. So lower your prices, make it more convenient to pay for services and people will just do that instead.

      • tux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, well they should keep it up. If they can prove in a US court that a “website is bad” they can make the same argument in the jurisdiction the website is hosted in, the Internet is great because it’s not (mostly) stuck under a single country’s thumb

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The MPAA still has never been able to demonstrate that privacy even has actual impacts on movie and ticket sales…

      It does. If everyone paid for tickets in cash and never online, they wouldn’t be able to harvest user data.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 months ago

    USDoJ: How about no.

    Oh, right. This isn’t 1992 when the DoJ had balls and a constitution.