• khorovodoved@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    As a guy from Russia, I must admit that vpns are not a big problem for censors. They can be easily blocked, including self-hosted ones by protocol detection. And DNS would not do much with IP and clienthello-based blocks. And most users are not enough tech-savvy to constantly switch to new protocols as old ones get blocked.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You have no rights in Russia.

      VPNs can’t be categorically banned in the US without major first amendment issues. It’s not a huge technical issue, but unless the courts just throw out the Constitution (a risk that we’re seeing too much of, but still a meaningful bar to cross), there are huge legal barriers to doing so.

      Your government doesn’t need to care about legal barriers because you have a dictator who can act unilaterally.

      • RedFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        We are just a little behind trying to elect our new dictator…

        But just for a day…

        /S 🙄

      • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        VPNs are not categorically banned in Russia either. Just 95% of them. Categorical ban is not actually required here. Government can just create licensing procedure and license only those VPNs, which follow “rules”. I do not see how this is different from ISP bans.

    • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      CBaaS

      Censorship Bypass as a Service, where your new updates are your [unique user ID].com

      Let us manage your bypass for you! Payable in crypto or cash.