• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m not sure how that’s relevant. People should be free to use whatever they want. I’m not interested in Russian software, but that doesn’t mean banning it is okay. The same goes for Chinese software like TikTok (not touching that), Iranian software, or North Korean software, if that’s even a thing. I don’t care if literal Nazis made the software, people should be free to use what they want.

      The only areas the government should get involved are:

      • government owned devices
      • public advisories
      • prosecution of crimes where the software is involved

      The software I choose to use is not the government’s business. If I violate a law, charge me with a crime, but don’t preemptively ban stuff.

      • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        What if said software is being used to manipulate national interests from a civilian level and its owned by an adverserial nation?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s one of the costs of liberty. The government will need to find another way.

          The barrier to banning something in the interests of national security must be much higher than “this could be used by our enemies.” That’s the entire basis for the War on a Terror, the Patriot Act, and the NSA spying on Americans, and I won’t stand for it. It’s also the same idea as banning books, that’s just not how a free society works.

          You combat misinformation through integrity and transparency, not bans.

        • ATDA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You do just as you did. Tell people and let them make up their minds. Posts like yours convinced me in the past and it will others in the future .

      • Kata1yst@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You found one video supporting your viewpoint. Kaspersky’s role in Russian intelligence has been an open secret since the mid 2010s. This is Facebook Anti-Vaxxer “research” methodology.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not that it was a secret at any point. That company has that approach to advertising and PR reminiscent of hacker movies as normies, lamers and “Windows power users” perceive them. Usually when there’s bullshit in one part, you expect it to be there in other parts too.

          But - their “antivirus check tool” or something was very convenient for me to remove winlockers somewhere in 2007. I do remember the good things.