• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The key they used to make the base engine was ripped from online

    Proof please. Since it never went to court, nothing like this would have been “found” through the process of discovery. I suspect you’re just making shit up.

    They also provided means to publicly available bios keys.

    Nope, you had to rip your own to use the software.

    They did distribute it, you just had to dig into discord or other means to find it, but it was there.

    Users chatting on discord != yuzu doing it.

    Nothing about Yuzu itself as a program was illegal. Period. How some of the developers talked in their Discord shows that they were using it for illegal things, which fucked them. Not the application itself.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      https://twitter.com/Zetta_330/status/1765081419687371165

      Look for yourself, they used someone else’s code, it’s technically not illegal according to the CLA of GitHub , but that’s not relevant to DCMA. It requires them to reverse engineer the code for an emulator, which they didn’t do.

      The dev provided the means in discord themselves, they also had a google drive with a ripped key, they also had files on discord of roms to test their gamesc which were acquired illegally.

      Please tell me what they did right to claim game preservation…?

      The fact that it didn’t go to discovery when other cases have is damning in itself, and you want it in your court? Okay….

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        https://twitter.com/Zetta_330/status/1765081419687371165 Look for yourself, they used someone else’s code, it’s technically not illegal according to the CLA of GitHub…

        It has nothing to do with some made up CLA that GitHub doesn’t even have ರ⁠_⁠ರ , it’s a matter of the license the project is under. Which is open source, e.g. GPL, Apache, MIT, etc. all of which doesn’t prevent the use of the code in other open source projects, especially when consent was already given before hand.

        …but that’s not relevant to DCMA.

        You bet your ass it isn’t, because the code from Ryujinx doesn’t infringe on Nintendo copyright either.

        DCMA

        It’s DMCA.

        … It requires them to reverse engineer the code for an emulator, which they didn’t do.

        How the shit do you think emulators are created without reverse engineering? You can’t be serious.

        Please tell me what they did right to claim game preservation…?

        They used clean room reverse engineering which is a form of independent creation and already has decades of precedent in its favor.