• Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    il y a 4 mois

    This is obviously not for large scale storage. But for stuff like cameras, which uses ever larger files for raw images

    • object [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      il y a 4 mois

      I totally get that… Here’s the thing though, at least in Norway a 1tb micro sd card costs 2200kr (~$203). If we extrapolate the price for a 4tb one, that’ll be 8800kr(~$813). If you or a company has the kind of money to spend almost a grand on a storage device, doesn’t that mean that the footage/photos are pretty valuable? If you had the kind of money/were going to record super valuable footage, wouldn’t you work hard to use cameras/recording systems that were capable of recording to redundant drives?

      What I don’t get is what market section this product would even fit in. It’s too expensive for regular consumers, and also has terrible value. It’s not good enough for professional settings because it has no drive monitoring, nor does it have redundancy. It isn’t fast enough for the kind of footage that would require that kind of space(unless you’re recording a month long realtime video).

      Also imagine how horrible the transfer speeds would be for individual photos when the os has to initiate a file transfer. If we say each photo is 20mb, that’s almost 200k photos. Yikes…