VITecNet@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 days agoTelegram repeatedly refused to join child protection schemeswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down124
arrow-up1219arrow-down1external-linkTelegram repeatedly refused to join child protection schemeswww.bbc.comVITecNet@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squarepotentiallynotfelix@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up117arrow-down3·19 days agoIf the programs were anything like this, I don’t blame them. There’s a fine line between child protection and surveillance.
minus-squarerc__buggy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down3·19 days agoBingo. The article even says that Telegram has removed confirmed content.
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·19 days agoHmm. I think many services just don’t and can’t participate because they’d need to break E2EE. Telegram wouldn’t with most chats.
If the programs were anything like this, I don’t blame them. There’s a fine line between child protection and surveillance.
Bingo. The article even says that Telegram has removed confirmed content.
Hmm. I think many services just don’t and can’t participate because they’d need to break E2EE. Telegram wouldn’t with most chats.