• skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fate of Mozilla is sad, I know one day they will announce a move to chromium. It might be after a buyout but they will switch chromium and than die

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If they switch to Chromium they lose their half a billion per year from Google to be the token “look we’re not a monopoly here’s competition” browser.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        Technically I think that’s still “put us first on the search bar” money. You’re giving the real under-the-table explanation.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The fate of Mozilla is sad, I know one day they will announce a move to chromium.

      why the fuck would they kill the thing that makes them money? Do you even understand what you are implying here??

    • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even if they did so, isn’t Firefox entirely open source? At least their work could be forked (though I agree if they don’t have the resources, hardly anyone else could make it)

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but is Google gonna pay them or you hoping they will do that work for free? A browser doesn’t seem like a hobby project to me.

        • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          They can also use Yahoo or Bing as default for money.

          The other option is diversify your revenue. Which is likely where the ad stuff comes in. If they can do that in a privacy respecting way with a facility to opt out, I have no objections. The loss of the biggest open source chromium alternative is massive and unthinkable.

          For all the flaws of Mozilla, no one has forked, done better and put it out of business. It’s easier to run it behind a keyboard with zero responsibility.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, but neither do many of the large open source projects that aren’t funded by Google.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Most large scale open source projects at this point are funded by somebody. usually because they have benefit to an enterprise somewhere. But I don’t know if an alternative browser really provides much enterprise support anywhere, sadly.