• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    SSDs can reliably hold charge states for years, and there are storage media that are more reliable than HDD.

    HDD’s would still find a niche, probably, as a balanced option, but said niche will likely get smaller and smaller over many years.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It will probably be a choice of quieter, faster, expensive vs loud, high capacity, pretty cheap.

      Unless we start with 3.5" SSDs (pls), HDDs will always be storage kings.
      Imagine 3.5" SSDs with 3-4 layer sandwiched PCBs…And inexpensive NAND…

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Why is 3.5" preferable? You can always use a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter, and even 2.5" casing is mostly empty anyway

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          More volume for more NAND-PCBs

          and even 2.5" casing is mostly empty anyway

          Does this count for the higher capacity drives (e.g. >2TB)? Preferably TLC?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      HDDs will probably always be useful for media storage, where quick access time isn’t required and it isn’t being used constantly. They should die for PCs though.