• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “B movie” is insane. But what they accomplished with their low budget is phenomenal, if that’s what they mean…

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 months ago

      I too was shocked and a bit offended that it was called a B movie. But the budget was a freaking measly $6.4 million.
      That’s peanuts even back in 1984.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Terminator

      Indeed they accomplished a lot, an all time classic movie. Some of my friends were a bit critical about the stop motion not being very good in their opinion. But I just thought the movie was amazing.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unpopular opinion: too big budget gives a bad movie. Lower budgets forces people to be more creative and keeps the suits away that would otherwise make it a designs by committee.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          That can be the case, but IMO Terminator 2 was an amazing follow up, and it had 15 times bigger budget.

          • exasperation@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            James Cameron has a history of making great things happen with a low budget, and spending millions responsibly to actually make a positive difference in big budget films.