• Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m truly, totally, completely shocked … that Windows is still being used on the server side.

    • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      We run a lot of Windows servers for specialized applications that don’t really have viable alternatives. It sucks, but it’s the same reason we use Windows clients.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Basically AD and the workstation management that uses it. Could all be run on a VM and snapshotted because you know it’s going to fuck up an update eventually. Perhaps SQL Server but that’s getting harder to justify the expense of anymore.

    • Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      A bunch of enterprise services are Windows only. Also Active Directory is by far the best and easiest way to manage users and computers in an org filled with a bunch of end users on Windows desktops. Not to mention the metric shitload of legacy internal asp applications…

        • Hobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No not really. It does the various services for the most part, but Active Directory is exclusively a Microsoft product. Group Policy in particular also does not have a drop in replacement that’s any sort of sane.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah at work we do a lot of internal microsoft asp stuff, poweshell, AD, ms access, all that old legacy ms stuff