This is a sobering post that revisits the notion that given a project, how many developers have to be hit by a bus before it stalls.
According to the methodology explained in the article, in 2015 it took 57 developers for the Linux kernel to fail, now it appears that it takes 8.
That’s not good.
the years as a system admin taught me that you can identify the influential contributors because they were the only people whose accounts were not immediately shut off when the management identified a bus factor.
and now i have a name for the phenomena; thank you.
What will happen when Linus dies ?
I guess there’s only one way to find out.
But please take a snapshot of the planet first
I always thought the more developers you added the higher the likelihood of stalling.
Two different concepts.
You’re talking about work slowing because of increased overhead from more people needing to communicate and make decisions.
The OP is talking about the"bus factor". How many people can leave the project unexpectedly and still have the project survive. E.g. if only one person has access to merge changes, the bus factor is 1 regardless of how many people actively contribute.
If the lessons that I’ve learned about lightbulb replacement are applicable, then the nationality of the developers on the bus will impact the answer to your question.
