• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Imperialism much?

    It is imperialism to let proxy governments for the UK and US maintain a colonial foothold in China actually.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      So the Taiwanese all desperately want to join the DPRC? Last I checked Taiwan was a sovereign nation. Capitalism has a foothold there but the British no longer rule there. Justifying imperialism with imperialism also doesn’t magically make it okay

      • Kieselguhr [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Last I checked Taiwan was a sovereign nation.

        Please, check again picard

        Disputes about Taiwan’s sovereignty is the most famous fact about Taiwan. You are deeply unserious.

        • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Okay I may have worded that wrong but that is also misleading. China is a huge power (I say this is a problem as you may recall). Having diplomatic ties with China is necessary for most nations. China refuses to have diplomatic ties with anyone who recognizes Taiwan as a sovereign nation. So, everybody pretends they don’t recognize it, officially. In reality Taiwan has its own government and isn’t ruled over by China. In 1991, Taiwan/ROC even recognized the DPRC.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Capitalism has a foothold there but the British no longer rule there. Justifying imperialism with imperialism also doesn’t magically make it okay

        No they just installed a friendly neocolonial government. Jesus Christ do some basic investigation. If the British invaded part of your hometown and installed a puppet government, would you call it imperialism for it to be taken back by your town?

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            So your argument is the geographical boundaries mean when a country is split it is imperialism to unite it again?

            Imagine if the confederacy retreated to the keys islands, that’s sort of the level of ridiculous here. The right wing losers of a civil war retreated to an island that was and is considered part of the country.

            • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I would go even further. If a country exists and everybody has a national identity, all happy citizens. Then one region decides to become separatist. If the rest of the country doesn’t let them separate, I would qualify that as imperialism as well.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Have you read anything on what imperialism actually is?

                I would suggest reading Lenin’s “Imperialism”