![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c1e74868-85a6-407d-a2da-b53f9187435e.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
Isn’t the entire point of the newer versions of Windows just to force the engagement with applications you normally wouldn’t use?
Isn’t the entire point of the newer versions of Windows just to force the engagement with applications you normally wouldn’t use?
Well, they aren’t alone. Blizzard and Activision is on my blacklist. As well as pretty much any studio own by Microsoft at this point… Oh, and Sony! Can’t forget about them.
The list is long.
This is sadly very standard right-wing stuff. OP actually thinks he’s being funny and “totally owning the libs”.
I’m gonna take a wild stab in the dark and say that OP might be from the USA.
I honestly thought the Assasins Creed games had run their course a while ago.
And until OP answers, we’ll never know. (Given that OP actually knows how unions work)
Probably because Valve doesn’t make games anymore. Not on any serious level anyway.
Most of their games are old as hell, and most of them where in the “proof of concept” relm. They only really made games to push the technology they were working with.
It’d be a poor argument to bring up their old catalog of games from 20 years ago as something that made them a worse company today.
It’s about more than just taking a 30% cut of sales. Everyone agrees that it’s a high price. So what else might the potential competition do that make them stand out as worse than Valve?
Also, overworked and underpaid Devs are a different matter. You have look at their Publishers about that. I believe Valves Devs are quite well paid and far from overburdened.
I think that, regardless of brand, most users just want the most basic (almost blank slate) OS that can run the programs they choose to install.
And that is close to, if not completely, impossible to get if you don’t have a mind for Linux.
I, for one, welcome Japanese George Washington, Indian Hitler and Inuit Ghandi to our historical database.
That’s more of a battle between players. The more we buy mtx, the more will be shoved in and the less actual game for everyone.
The best Larian can do is keep being a better example.
As I understand it, it’s to get out of Disneys iron clad contracts.
Disney values it’s family friendly image very much. And it’s the only way to get out of what is close to a slave contract.
All the more reason to keep it “quite” and expansive like the first game.
BZ was so noisy and tiny. That, combined with other players would be terrible.
I think OG Subnautica could be fun with a Co-op mode. But any more players than that would ruin it.
Which is the same as ‘lemmy funny.’
Let’s not kid ourselves.
Can’t we do both?
Twitch Interactive is an Amazon subsidiary.
Aside from that, I don’t know. I guess it’s supposed to be sarcasm.