Almost like crying about Steam “exclusives”, creating an actual exclusivity PC war, and handing out free games to prop up a shitty marketplace and launcher wasn’t such a good financial decision…
Lol. “Xanax addicted clout goblin” is a fantastic image.
I will never understand how mumble rap became popular AFTER the reign of multiple rap gods.
Except there are ways to use the waste as fuel. So no, not some “capitalist bullshit”. Just a problem with a solution.
That’s why we’ve already seen breakthroughs in reactors that use nuclear waste for fuel.
I saw this show on Broadway and would not classify it as family friendly or aimed at kids. 90s cartoons were more subtle in their cussing and sexual comments. Fantastic show I would recommend again and again.
That does not justify what they did though. She may rock the dress, but take your horny selves home. Classic GOP hypocrisy.
You know they’re doping though. Kinda ruins the fun.
Fossil fuels cause massive environmental damage. Let’s cause some more!
My thoughts exactly. Not earning enough? Improve your lifestyle or career.
He’s still on the board though. So user or not, he’s profiting off user data.
Gotta keep Jack Dorsey relevant somehow.
Get yourself a heavy glass mug. Lift gains while you drink.
Saint Harambe, passing on his wisdom. RIP you fucking legend. This day drink’s for you.
You can’t wrap your head around it because you simply don’t want to. Of course I didn’t mention every single potential crop. I mentioned the three most widely grown, around the entire world. Corn, rice, and soy. Yes, others would do well, but building above these crops would never work on large agricultural areas. Why? Because you need machinery to harvest large grow ops before they spoil. Farmers would never afford the human labor required to match. It will work great on smaller scale farms, people using upwards of 25 acres. What does that achieve power wise though by comparison? Not enough power.
Pastures are an issue for two reasons. One, grass needs direct sunlight to properly grow. Two, animal agriculture is a major cause of carbon emissions. We need less pastureland, and covering it doesn’t help. You could convert existing pastureland into a reactor site, saving existing nature from development.
You would still need to develop new land for larger arrays. Land use that could be minimized by maximizing the possible power output.
Because that was the discussion, the amount of energy produced by nuclear vs other clean means and the amount of area dedicated for each to produce the same.
There are very few ignorantly disagreeing with this easy to prove fact, you being one of them. I do understand scale of a country, and the space required to power it via reactors saves hundreds of thousands of acres when compared to solar and wind.
Go Google the required acreage for each and educate yourself. You’re the one being ridiculous by attempting to call me out for “one single argument” and then continuing to prove you have no real concept of size and scale.
Removed by mod