She asks if he wants to go on a walk, he agrees (as it’s implied that they’re going together), she says “see you around” revealing that she actually wanted him to go on a walk by himself and leave her alone.
She asks if he wants to go on a walk, he agrees (as it’s implied that they’re going together), she says “see you around” revealing that she actually wanted him to go on a walk by himself and leave her alone.
I’m really tired of hearing “you don’t own it you own a license to it” like it’s some revelation for people complaining. We’re aware that the system has been constructed to benefit media companies at the expense of consumers.
To be honest; I never really bought the argument anyway. From a legal standpoint I don’t give half a shit. From a layman’s standpoint it’s bullshit. Nowhere do they use terms like “rent” or “lease”. They explicitly use terms like “buy” and it’s not until the fine print that the term license even comes up.
They know they’re pissing on you and telling you it’s raining and the goobers doing their legwork by repeating the sentence like they just came up with it annoy me to no end.
Humanity will survive the climate apocalypse. Life is incredible at adaptation. But our present society won’t survive and our descendents will curse us for sitting idle while their future was sacrificed for the sale of lethargy.
In my experience, women tend to opt for straws when wearing lipstick and everyone opts for them when too much ice gets in the way of a good sip.
Name one time we solved a systemic problem through individual action. You solve systemic problems with systemic solutions.
Frederick Douglass the famous non-slave
IIRC on the PS2 and earlier triangle was usually back. Just an extra little dash of inconsistency to ruin your day.
You’re confusing Kim Jong Un with Kim Jong Il.
This is the worst Venn diagram I’ve ever read and even if it wasn’t the point would still suck.