Jaytreeman

Voting is the minimum. The reason there’s no decent alternative is because people vote and think they did their part.

If you’re voting for the lesser of two evils and that lesser is actively supporting genocide, but you’re complaining about people that are saying ‘both sides bad’…

‘If you’re curious what you would do to stand up against genocide, you’re doing it now’ - a braver man than me

I appreciate you

One of the defining traits of the left is empathy.
One of the defining traits of humanity is empathy.
If you’re not left you’re less than. I said it. I stand by it.

I’ve noticed that the more German posts I see the better the overall content.
I see ‘ish iel’ I upvote

Anyone know of kbin or Lemmy instances that will insta de-federate from anything meta?

Edit: missed the ‘de’

How about respecting the sovereign land of the people that don’t have treaties yet? Wetsuoten (spelling?) land defenders are still being harassed by the RCMP on the regular

Canadian here. I believe in reconciliation with the indigenous population, but I’ve yet to see anything but words from provincial and federal governments

Lukashenko.
Segal has been cozying up pretty hard to the eastern Europe dictators. Like little spoon cozy. A belaspoo if you will

It’s an account with a lot of bad jokes with some gems dropped in.

Those territories are so small that a dmz might just be the entire area…

Yeah, should have said ‘noticed’ rather than ‘watched’

My entire life I’ve watched girls get breasts at a younger and younger age…

Coercive behavior doesn’t quite work though.
Yours is better than either of the ones posted, but I do think the physical force aspect is important to differentiate from other aspects.

I was going to attempt to make a point about how stopping terrorism that isn’t explicitly violent with violence isn’t the same thing.

Starving a population isn’t violence, but it is terrorism. Attempting to give that population food and being stopped by the state by legal means is terrorism.

The state is going to define things in specific ways to ensure that they’re considered correct.

I had written out a response to the person I replied to and then didn’t post after reading some of their other comments. They’re probably just a troll, or one of those people that’s legitimately kind of smart but hasn’t been around people that are incredibly smart, so hasn’t had a reason to adjust their opinions about things because they might be shallowly correct but are fundamentally wrong. Like Newton’s laws.

Violence is a key word in that definition.

Violence: Behavior or treatment in which physical force is exerted for the purpose of causing damage or injury.

So, starving a group of people isn’t terrorism because you’re not exerting physical force.

Not easily stopping a fire when you know it’s going to spread towards an occupied house isn’t violence because you’re not exerting physical force.

Poisoning drinking water isn’t violence because you’re not exerting physical force.

Real question: what do you call those things? It can’t be defined as terrorism. What is it?

Yep. I want a nice echo chamber. I don’t want to hear stupid opinions about how my loved ones are less than.

Arthur is literally a scientist.
He also does edutainment

You could have resources from asteroids. There’s lots of options out there

I heard about it on one of Isaac Arthur’s videos. I can’t remember which one, but the analogy he used was that earth’s magnetosphere is essentially a big motor created by earth’s metal core spinning. (Oversimplified) So you should be able to build a motor that would shield a station

You can make a radiation field by running a large motor that would save you from the solar radiation.
In space you always have access to the sun. A cheap form of power. You need a lot more batteries if you’re on the planet.

Venus is a much better idea over mars.

In order to colonize mars, having a good space station in orbit would help out immensely. We’re talking big enough to stretch out and hold a few hundred people.
The station would need to grow crops and have minor but flexible manufacturing.
At that point, why would you colonize mars vs just make more stations?