• 0 Posts
  • 123 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle






  • Liz@midwest.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlDebate this!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    Technically no, but it’ll never happen.

    The way the parties nominate candidates for president is an absolute mess, but the nominations aren’t official until the parties hold a closed convention with delegates who vote for candidates to be the nominee. Back in the day these delegates used to actually be the people who decided who got nominated. These days they’re more like a ceremonial role, with a lot of them (I think) being required to vote in line with the way people voted in their state’s primary.

    Anyway, I’d have to look it up to be 100% sure, but I’m pretty sure enough delegates have some kind of autonomy that it’s possible they could nominate someone other than Biden. Who they would end up agreeing on…? Heck if I know.





  • See here’s where this analogy is perfect. Sometimes a bicycle is the best solution, just like how sometimes a microcontroller is the best solution. You use the tool you need for the job, and American product design is creating way too many “smart” products just like how American town planning demands too many cars. Bring back the microcontroller! Bring back the bike!







  • Liz@midwest.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlBig scared
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Not that I actually consider the Bible to be an authoritative source on morality (see: slavery), but are those faithful to the original texts? I only ask because it’s my understanding that sexuality wasn’t viewed as a straight-gay spectrum back then, but instead as a dominate-submissive spectrum. Like, if they were to actually have a problem with same sex acts, it was more to do with messing with the social order than any inherit sexuality problems.


  • Liz@midwest.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlBig scared
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Is that the “lay with another man” bit? I’m pretty sure there’s arguments over the original text, and scholars think it originally meant “don’t have sex with little boys” not don’t have sex with men.