I don’t know and I was wrong seems to be some of the hardest things to say
I don’t know and I was wrong seems to be some of the hardest things to say
I can’t imagine what it’s like to not to be able to live honestly without getting disappeared.
That applies to all investment banks no? Or is Wells Fargo a special kind criminal?
Yeah, our government has been an absolute joke lately. We do have our fair share of neo nazis but that incident was pure incompetence.
It feels like musk needs this money desperately to pay off some debt he owes to some very unsavory people. As long as he bribes all the right people in sufficient amounts they’ll be happy enough to fold the company and hope for a massive government bailout.
It might quell the lifestyle image of the phenomenon. If it does, it’s only a few drops in the bucket.
This should be worked on seriously. Our future looks bleak and we need to do something about it.
Could a non-human vanguard be possible for a broader scope of governance? I don’t trust humanity all that much when it come to dictation.
I’m definitely not an expert on this. But let’s take foss as an example. I find it to be an amazing bottom up community that contributes to itself freely. I can’t imagine how a top down system would flourish if a small group of people decided what was good for the foss community and deleted what they thought wasn’t. Is there is a distinction? Is there different versions of communism I should check out?
Understandable. But how does a government choose the label, in this case, communism, when the it’s governed by a very small group of individuals and in most cases against the will of the people?
Isn’t “communism” essentially authorianism? I’d love to see true communism in action but humans tend to be too flawed to give up all that power.
Okay, commisar.
That’s a bold strategy, wow. Believe it or not, banned.
I too have received bans for very innocuously based opinions there. I like having civil discussions that expand my scope but they’re not having any of that. Feels bad man.
History has a way of repeating itself. Best we can hope for is a soft reset. It will always be this way until human avarice is somehow ejected from our genome.
Get facial recognition to lay the heat on someone else might be a good start. Gotta game the system to destroy it.
Most people don’t. But if they keep chipping away their customers, Linux might reach a threshold where it’s more convenient to switch.
What is proper cheese? Have I been eating uncultured filth?
The definitions and semantics are getting stressed to breaking points. We don’t have clear philosophy of mind for us humans let alone an overlay of other non human agents.
LLMs are a start. I can see it being the machine/human interface to a broard array of specialized applications. If we want to see true ai we’ll need to add efficient complexity, and perhaps, if we don’t want it to exclusively be contained in a platonic type realm, we’ll need our programs direct access and explore our physical one.