![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/156e13a6-4667-4631-920a-ee5f4feb737b.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
“former”
“former”
Do people outside of tech care?
Some other countries have the decency to add something like “of the USA” to the name. But this being the USA, of course he is just “the” president.
Imagine if twitter some day opens its gates and starts federating with everyone. Then the musk takeover would have actually improved the world. Even though it hurt his purse a lot, but that is also an improvement I believe.
Arguably, they could just make movement a separate kind of action in DOS as well.
There is one skill in DOS2 that grants a free movement action every turn. I use it for my backstabbing rogue, and it rocks!
Maybe this fits better into a car community
I didn’t read more than the abstract. It sounds like they are arguing that hallucinations are inevitable because the LLM cannot know everything. But wouldn’t it be enough for the LLM to know what it knows, and therefore know what it does not know?
Or just men with physically strong women.
The optimal phone is both corded and wireless: it has a receiver corded to a base piece with a traditional dial, but the base piece is wireless.
I would think that subscribing to a community could be coupled to a license. Servers do not randomly send data, they only send it to other servers that are subscribed. And a server could technically decline a subscription.
But anyways, by default, copyright is with the creator. No idea what that looks like in legislations around the world, but if I remember correctly, in EU, just because you give a copy of a e.g. song you wrote to someone, does not actually mean they can do with it what they want. By default, you have all the rights, and the someone else needs to grant them to you. So if you give that someone also a contract where it states that he can play it in front of an audience, then they can, otherwise they cannot.
However, I am not sure how much implied consent can play a role here. By posting something on a fediverse instance, since the purpose of the fediverse is to share these posts with other servers, then by posting you may implicitly agree to this data being shared, and the next server can share it with another server again, and so on. This is the basic “boost” functionality of mastodon.
I believe though that because the purpose of the fediverse is not explicitly to train AI models or to sell the posts to someone else, it may be illegal to scrape all posts off to feed e.g. an AI model. But may also not be. We will never know until someone starts doing it and someone else sues them.
Legally, in EU, you probably cannot scrape an instance of someone else because of the database copyright law. But I have no idea if that applies to being part of the network. Since the other instances send you their content willingly.
Maybe someone should make a license extension to ActivityPub, where instances can communicate what can and what can’t be done with the information they publish. Then at least there would be legal clarity. If it can be enforced is another question.
How much is a wind-proof windshield? And do they also offer air-proof tires?
Packaging machines are getting more accurate, but producers just use that to stretch the legal limits instead of improving their honesty.
What’s a sheevaplug?
Did you know that the weather in the mountains can change rapidly and without warnings?
Isn’t the point of “conservatives” to tear everything down? Because then they just elected the right man for that.
Wow they actually did it! Congratulations and welcome to the age of second-gen systems languages!
The middle is what usually happens if people are on the verge of breaking even. Then it’s immensely stressful, because they have to switch jobs otherwise. And where to do you go if you are uneducated and have experience in nothing else but streaming? While being not successful at that.
Looks anorexic to me. Hope they are fine
This feels unreal.