What business practices in particular?
What business practices in particular?
Then carefully remove the sprouts and eat the rest.
FLASH
Aaah aaaaa
Get in your car and go buy yourself a fire truck.
Your /S wasn’t loud enough. Next time try /S
Buy a second phone?
Then delete system32 folder?
What are these instructions actually doing?
One inaccuracy in a historical report allows detractors to call the whole thing a lie.
Invisible instant tattoos delivered in the same way as a vaccine? That is new. It’s not easy to mark someone without them knowing.
Gates funded. Tick. Spy program (covert tattooing). Tick.
You’re the one moving the goalposts by inventing new GPS tracking strawmen arguments.
Do you often tattoo excel spreadsheets on your body?
It’s the gates funded spy program you referred to. You don’t need compute resources or location tags. Just a way to store data on a person.
Get vaccinated, get tattooed
Passed your driving test, get tattooed
Pay your tax, get tattooed
Arrest at a protest, get tattooed
Etc.
Yes. The Oxford vaccine should have been open source. Gates money changed that.
Partially enabled. Without mRNA we still would have had J&J and Astrazenica.
JFK conspiracy theorists would disagree.
You can’t logically lump all conspiracies together like that.
Belief isn’t needed.
MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine. https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
And Bill Gates talking about doing it in a reddit AMA.
Yes. The Jannsen and Oxford vacancies.
However, vaccines using mRNA technology are VERY new.
MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.
The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Motive is subjective but the funding isn’t.
Still not sure why you are so adamant about giving $5 a month to a monopoly generating 30bn per year. But you be you.
The difference is 45% of $12 and your original goal at the top of this thread was to support your content creators, not YouTube.
Add milk until the colour of He-man