but looks like they don’t include a split spacebar, so not for me unfortunately.
You could split it yourself. It’s ceramics after all.
but looks like they don’t include a split spacebar, so not for me unfortunately.
You could split it yourself. It’s ceramics after all.
This has to be the most idiotic thing I read this week.
Landgericht Hamburg enters the room to agree with the plaintiff.
Who doesn’t. I’m sure he also consumed bread. (But I fail to see the connection with the case. )
Which Page?
lots of dom modifications
That’s good to know. These modifications are needed to replace the style sheet details, I guess?
passes around far too much data between processes.
What does this mean? Do you have a link where I could read up on the details? Thanks.
Maybe. Does it make a big performance difference which css (dark reader or delivered by wiki) is used?
Is it known how the default to dark mode setting is persisted if let’s say a plugin removed all the Wikipedia cookies on window close? A get or post parameter?
Either way it’s a good thing that wiki offers a dark mode.
Dark Reader Plugin already solved that issue.
I like your pitch black humour.
In my opinion it is its limited suitability for (my) common image editing needs. I.e. add a white text with black border to an image.
But these are my requirements. The developers don’t have to cater to them if they don’t want to. I in turn can decide to not use the program or add the features I would like to see myself (It’s the former for me).
That is the way it is.
Edit: The name gimp was never an issue for me. There are far worse.
To blow leaves.
Divide by 1/2 or multiply with 2/1. It’s an equivalent transformation.
Not anymore, you don’t!
I’d like to have darkness during daytime. I’m not sure I would pay for it, but I’d like it very much.