Yes it’s called ‘You left your carbon footprints on my heart’
Yes it’s called ‘You left your carbon footprints on my heart’
Plato’s Rust cave base
Bingo. Capitalism has thus far rejected the blockchain, which is generally evidence that it doesn’t solve an important problem either efficiently, safely or cheaply.
“technically this thievery isn’t covered by law”
"technically this what?”
"OBJECTION!”
Appreciate it being current affairs, but there’s been a visible shift in the lean of the content on this sub past few days
The 1 day old account speaks to that.
Couldn’t manage the straight answer, huh? I suppose that would categorise you as “troll”?
Wtf is happening in this community. Has it been coopted by right wing trolls?
Like, downvote me, but give me a straight answer too.
deleted by creator
From another article
All seven who participated in the harassment have been convicted. Baugh was sentenced to 57 months in prison in September 2022.
It was a small group of employees targeting one couple, and it looks like most of them will be going to prison.
While I agree that the $3m is chump change for eBay, the victims deserve the settlement, and some justice has been served.
I dunno, rich people will no grasp on the real world spring to mind
You made this?
Fork
I made this
You sound like the guy from Whiplash
If you find dismissal of your inability to coherently explain the concept you brought up rude, that’s your prerogative.
You’ve said enough to demonstrate you don’t understand basic empiricism, have not done sufficient reading on the topic that - again - you brought up, and have contradicted yourself in your own comment.
You are dishonest, and we’re pretty much done here.
Except it isn’t a theory then is it? It’s a hypothesis.
And belief in a hypothesis that has not reached the quality of scientific theory, is just that: belief.
And it’s grossly dishonest of you to argue otherwise, so take your wordplay and nonsense somewhere else.
deleted by creator
You’ve, uh, really thought this through
Murdered 4 people when they could have served and only killed one.
4/5 *
Of course it’s a belief. Any position held as fact in the absence of evidence is a belief, and is irrational by definition.
It also absolutely does not provide an explanation of “purpose”. Someone else already wrote a good comment about why that is.
It wasn’t about video length, it was about the Twitter leadership at that time being categorically incapable of monetizing any of their products.
Combine that with the orders-of-magnitude higher cost of running Vine compared to the bird, and it was always either going to be sold off or shut down.
It’s easy to forget that this was back in the time when these companies thought they were changing the planet for the better and drinking their own Kool aid by the gallon.