The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

Ten years ago sure, the days I’d suggest matrix instead.

It’s an abundant resource curse; land is the resource that is wasted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

Is that a picture of a straw man?

a little bit of Stockholm syndrome and some trauma bonding.

Yes of course. I was meaning in terms as a direct response to that pretty dumb statement from Linus.

The counter statement is that a union is insurance for when good management goes bad.