No thanks
No thanks
Anatsa uses advanced techniques to avoid >detection and gain access to banking >information.
Anyone who knows what those advanced techniques are?
There is probably licensed code in there somewhere. Which means open sourcing it is really cumbersome. It would probably cost more money to open source it than to do the refund.
It’s so weird that Google migrated to the pile of dung that is RCS instead of just fostering any of their existing chat protocols. Google Talk was working great 15 years ago…
Yes, unstable Debian is still hella stable. But you probably don’t want to suggest it as the first Linux dust since you need some extra carefulness when updating.
Hopefully they have a usable amount of RAM.
Never thought of that. Scary though.
Unless you live and travel within the EU. Then you can use your phone as much as you want and know that you won’t get a higher bill than usual.
I agree with this but I suspect that a lot of the backend is dependent on other in-house infrastructure so it’s not as easy as most people think.
Exactly, it’s just an estimate.
I couldn’t agree more. I hate that some open source projects are using discord for communicating.
The package name is the unique id. If you want to distribute multiple variants (like two versions with differing signatures) they should not have the same identifier. If they are not the same the id/package name should not be the same.
Having different package names would also prevent the Google play store from trying to update it.
It’s a problem of trust. Differing signature is an indication of third party tampering. People shouldn’t start to see difference in signatures as an ordinary occurrence. It should be an high alert event.
Mismatched signatures have been discouraged since day one of Android. A mismatched signature is a sign that some one other than the original publisher built this package, and the user needs to be aware that it might be malicious.
That F-Droid went with this setup with mismatched signatures was always going to make their apks look suspicious.
This is an f-droid problem. If they use the same package name, they need to use the same signature. That has been the case since long before f-droid existed.
They could just build apks with alternate package names and this wouldn’t be an issue.
Yes, the top most directory, /, is the root directory.
Each directory is a branch in one giant tree structure. For example, if you have a directory containing two other directories, that is a branch that is splitting into two branches. All directories are descendants of the same root.
Gnome with the gTile extension is quite nice.
It’s enough that you have read the code before implementing an alternative to get into legal trouble.
I try to follow Bash strict mode. It can protect you from some foot shooting.