Of course! It’s not like animals have jet engines!
Human brains are merely the proof that such energy efficiencies are possible for intelligence. It’s likely we can match or go far beyond that, probably not by emulating biology directly. (Though we certainly may use it as inspiration while we figure out the underlying principles.)
You should research the definition of AI then. Even the A* pathfinding algorithm was historically considered AI. It’s a remarkably broad field.
Even Zuckerberg admits that trying to scale LLMs larger doesn’t work because the energy and compute requirements go up exponentially. There must exist a different architecture that is more efficient, since the meat computers in our skulls are hella efficient in comparison.
Once we figure that architecture out though, it’s very likely we will be able to surpass biological efficiency like we have in many industries.
Right, so AIs don’t really know what words are. All they see are tokens. The tokens could be words and letters, but they could also be image/video features, audio waveforms, or anything else.
I dunno if this changes any of the UX paradigms, but I heard GIMP is about to release a huge major version.
It’s certainly true. Trump’s also close with Musk these days, and Musk certainly will pressure him to allow Grok to vacuum up all the data for free.
I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.
I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.
What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.
He’s probably got a dumb name, like Bill or Willie.
They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.
Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.
Yeah the way I phrased it was super awkward
Safari is WebKit, which branched off from Chrome when Google forked WebKit into Blink. So they’re like siblings.
I agree with you in principle. Legally, the courts are still deciding.
If bitnet takes off, that’s very good news for everyone.
The problem isn’t AI, it’s AI that’s so intensive to host that only corporations with big datacenters can do it.
I think the next step in AI is learning how to control and direct the speech, rather than just make computers talk.
They are surprisingly good for being a mere statistical copycat of words on the internet. Whatever the second tier innovation is that jumps AI into true reasoning rather than pattern matching is going to be wild.
If you get killed by a robot, it simply lacks the human touch.
Sounds like it lasts closer to 100 days now, that’s an improvement.
I agree that it’s probably not illegal for him to do that. But it is solvable if we decide to legislate some long overdue guardrails.
I use single window mode but it still does not stop modal dialogs from popping up in the stupidest places on my dual monitor setup.
I’m actually okay with semi-centralized. Most people need that to trust a platform, but it still gives you the option to self host if you really care.