• Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The headline is 6 words. The article is 3,606 words. Expressed as a percentage, the amount of content you have decided to address comes to a grand total of 0.16%.

      If you have no interest in interacting with the content, it would be simple enough to state that. But to dismiss the entirety of the article based on 0.16% of the content seems rather short sighted to me. Do you have any thoughts to share about the article?

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nah, I’m allergic to clickbait. If it had a better, more serious title, I’d read it.

        If you’re the author of the article, you have to find that line between interesting and clickbait. Sensationalist titles like that are like smearing a distasteful substance on the cover of a book. No matter what you write in that book, I’m not picking it up.

        Possible titles (without even reading the article) that would make me click with an open mind

        • Threats to the open web
        • How much has the web changed since $date?
        • Where does the web go after $event?
        • The future of the web - an opinion
        • How do monopolies affect the internet?

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s more like it, this is a discussion that people can actually interact with! I am not the author, and I agree with you that the title isn’t great, but I am interested in discussing what they wrote and appreciate that you’ve now at least opened the door to a discussion on clickbait titles rather than just leaving a one sentence “gotcha”.