• Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Except his argument is flawed on its own grounds, because the bigger the animal the more food it takes to support it before you come along and kill it. Assuming we had an objective measure of sentience, it’s pretty likely most non-herbivores are costing more sentience than your save by eating them.

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      At which point we should just cause the extinction of all animals except humans and the few plants needed to support humans. See how that’s a horrible metric?