Do you know any service cheaper than Backblaze?

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Tarsnap charges you for the compressed, deduplicated storage used, so if you’re mostly backing up documents and working files, the amount of storage used is way lower than the raw uncompressed storage. This includes deduplication at a block level.

        If you use Backblaze B2 with Restic, you can get the same functionality at a much lower price, but requires more setup.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          How many home users are backing up multiple terabytes of documents, though? I’d expect the vast majority of backed up data to be images and video in most cases.

        • flatbield@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Thanks. That is what it seemed like to me. $245 for the software and $5 for the storage per month. Which of course is a bit nuts.

          Block level deduplication does seem interesting. My experience file level dedup is not that effective though of course incrementals are. Compression is not either but easy to do. Lot of document formats are already compressed too. Cross system dedup could be large savings also.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    By the way, some of the mentioned services are annual and block pricing. Those plans, the per TB cost depends on where you are in their brackets. Backblaze is pay as you go which is more flexible and you do not pay for more then you use.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    S3 compatible? Wasabi is $.99/TB more, but has no egress or API fees whatsoever. So depending on use, it can be cheaper. For archiving purposes, Amazon Deep Glacier is a lot cheaper for storage (but expensive for retrieval).

    Non-S3? Take a look at Hetzner Storage Box.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Note that Wasabi has no egress fees, but has a transfer limit - essentially the contract stipulates that your monthly egress will be less than the amount of storage you pay for.

    • elvith@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Amazon Deep Glacier is a lot cheaper for storage (but expensive for retrieval).

      I use Archive Storage in Oracle Cloud S3 for my dr backups which is their equivalent of AWS deep glacier archive. It’s quite cheap, no restore fees, inbound traffic is free and outbound traffic is only paid, when you’re using more than 10TB per month. (Also first 10 GB of S3 storage is free)