What is this? Some sort of ‘protect the children because they’re totally not using apples and soda cans’ bullshit?

Why is this in any way necessary or even useful?

Edit: Just discovered this was about tobacco, making this even stupider since this product isn’t for tobacco, it’s for cannabis. https://dclcorp.com/blog/news/pact-act-impacts-vape-industry/

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not a medical vaporizer but yes, it is for medical use. The ‘certain substance’ is definitely the issue here considering the stupid drug war.

    • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ok, buddy. There’s not any indication that’s even a law and not just policy from the company selling the device.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Recent regulations” means law. Companies don’t call their own policies regulations, they call them policies.

        • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That doesn’t mean the law says signatures are required. It could only be how the company chose to respond to the law. Got a citation?