• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m sorry, why the fuck aren’t these street legal in more than half of the states? The article says something about safety, but these are street legal all over Europe where we have stronger safety regulations.

    Also there’s something I can’t put my finger on about the journalist choosing a hero image of the van losing its cargo.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Probably because it’s not safe to drive them around giant pickups who can’t see over their hoods

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        84
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Europe and Japan all have freight trucks driving around, so I don’t buy that. The fact that many states won’t allow these is American truck manufacturing protectionism, nothing more. It’s the same reason you can only get a 3/4 or 1 ton truck from Ford, Chevy, or Ram (chicken tax).

        • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Cab over engine freight trucks with excellent visibility, not jacked up chevys where your view of the ground starts 20 feet in front of you

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            And that’s precisely because the option isn’t readily available here. We can argue merits of different countries versus the US, but at the end of the day it is what it is unless something changes at the legislative level.

            When say a contractor goes to purchase a work vehicle, the option is either a van, which have pathetic motors and hauling capabilities, or a pickup from one of the big 3 that can be outfitted with a utility body. Sometimes you can score one of those Isuzu cabovers, but they’re typically outfitted with a full sized box on the chassis, and they’re far and few between, and often more expensive. Vans are also stupid expensive, especially 4x4 models, because of the van life crowd. The options really are much more limited than other parts of the world, and I truly believe it’s to keep prices high and the money vacuum humming. Plus, you can find an older utility body truck for a fraction of the cost of a used van (I just did this 6 months ago; granted I’m in California, so my experience may not be the norm).

            I ended up buying a Ram 2500 when looking for a work truck. I would’ve loved a 25/35 class van, but I need 4x4 (mountains, snow), and because of the premium those models fetch due to demand from the van life people, that wasn’t an option.

            And I dunno about other people, but I know what’s in front of my truck at all times. It really isn’t that hard to mind your surroundings.

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sure, but as I responded to someone else, show me a viable option that’s readily available in the states for a contractor or someone delivering heavy stuff that has the power and 4x4 to do the thing at a reasonable price. I’m all for getting some of these European/Japanese solutions over here, but they simply aren’t available or affordable, and so we’re stuck with oversized pickups and under powered vans until something changes.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just noting as a reference these trucks are 11ft long, a Miata is roughly 20% longer at 13ft.

            • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I didn’t really intend for it to be a comparison or supporting the narrative these trucks are ‘too small for America’, I just find many people hear small truck and imagine “like a ford ranger but a little less”, as their starting reference point. Gotta go smaller, scale is tough.

              • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                My bad. It just seems like the low hanging fruit everyone plays off of.

                We actually used to get vehicles close to this size. The Suzuki samurai (really a jimny) was sold here for a number of years. Geo sold a fair number of almost kei cars that Suzuki made.

                I’m a fan of limiting them from interstate highways, but keeping them registrable. It’s just dumb they cite “safety” even though the law explicitly calls out they aren’t required to be safe. I just want a nice 25-45 mph city truck to lug dirty junk around.

                But if anyone is curious, Douglas deBoard imported so many European cars in the 80’s that cut into the profits of Mercedes USA enough that they pushed the law through. Buying them in Europe and importing them was actually cheaper (in some aspects) than buying a US market one. And the imported cars were better equipped!

                It wasn’t even about protecting American manufacturers or trucks. Mercedes has just always been a huge dick.

                • kalpol@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  No lie. Gray market Mercedes were awesome. Way more powerful and you could get base models with zero cruft - manual transmissions and wind up windows.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is how we got in this mess, an arms race of trying to feel safe around larger and larger hunks of metal on the road. Americans just have to endanger everyone else for their own peace of mind.

        • caffinatedone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Smart cars had to pass US crash test standards and have the appropriate safety equipment. The kei trucks that you can currently import and use are 25+ years old and wouldn’t have even passed US standards back then. Your legs are the crumple zone in these things.

          I assume that new ones would have a chance, but it’d be expensive for a manufacturer to modify and certify for the US market. Small cars haven’t sold well here, and the profit margins are slim.

          Maybe with the recent size and price increases in autos here, well see some movement. I’d love a modern Honda kei to go with my element.

          • Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            The crumple zone thing is a bit grey as the USA sells and allows trucks like the Isuzu NPR/Chevy Cab Over.

          • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I get all that, but the individual I replied to only related small size to safety. I was merely pointing out that size isn’t a factor.

            I appreciate your post, and agree completely! A Kei truck would satisfy all my requirements for a utility vehicle.

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m sorry, their problem is that the massive trucks are somehow in danger because they weren’t designed to handle being hit by a vehicle less than half its size?

          What a ridiculous statement.

          • Live Your Lives@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s not what they are saying at all. They’re saying small vehicles aren’t even safe in crashes with other small vehicles, let alone with bigger vehicles.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            They took a street legal Smart ForTwo…

            Then crashed it into a little electric truck and a golf cart…

            And they want stuff to be as safe as the Smart car.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ya. Everything’s expensive, so people buy the cheapest thing [with four wheels]. I don’t want folks on the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum to think these are a safe option.

        If(?) a ‘90s Honda sedan is safer but the Kei is new and looks cute, for the same price many will choose the less safe option.

        Eight Californians die on our roads every day here and I can’t wait for some solutions. I really do empathize with everyone you readers care about (no oil companies, no just-for-funsies-truck manufacturers) - I hate the thought of crumpled and crushed human bodies.

    • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Speed restrictions.

      Kei trucks were designed for use in dense Japanese cities, which is why they also work in European cities. They are nimble but have a low top speed. You’re not going 70 mph around a street corner for instance.

      It would work in places like NYC for the same reasons, but remember that most of the USA is suburban or rural. You need vehicles that are capable of going fast if you’re going to get on a highway.

      A possible workaround is to have a separate class for these, like mopeds or scooters, which are road legal but are not highway legal.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That work around is what most states that explicitly legalized kei trucks have done, they can’t enter roads over 55mph. It’s a reasonable concession, you probably don’t want to take one over 50mph anyway.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Most places in the US are connected by 55 mph roads. I’d be hard-pressed to get anywhere but the city center in most places I’ve lived if I couldn’t use those roads.

          Farm equipment and bikes use those roads all the time, and they go even slower, so I don’t think being able to keep up with traffic is a valid concern.

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            6 months ago

            Note that I said over 55, rural connection roads should still be traversable since most are 55. Basically limits them from entering the interstate highways.

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Southern California is entirely navigable by surface streets, but also too, there are plenty of vehicles going only 55 in the slow lanes, which is the speed limit for trucks anyway (though few pay attention to it). I have a '72 camper that can barely do 50, and I take it on the freeway several times a year.

          • Grangle1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I live in one of the most rural states in the country, where loads to haul are generally large and the posted speed limit on the highway is usually 75 mph, and the de facto highway speed is usually 5-10 mph above that. No truck that can barely push 70 is gonna keep up with that. On top of that, you’re dealing with ice and snow on the roads half the year, so you’ll need to be able to deal with that too.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        In Illinois, at least, your motorcycle has to be 150cc to ride on the interstate. A Chinese GY6 scooter might be able to do 50MPH with a tailwind. You’d get killed on the interstate on one of those, yet, fully legal to do it.

        • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’d get killed on the interstate on one of those,

          You guys in Illinois are crazy though. I learned very quickly how much that 55 MPH limit is a guideline and not a hard limit.

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Depends on what part of Illinois you’re talking about, I’m from southern Illinois and we typically only go about 60/65 on highway and 75/80 on interstate. Chicagoans will honk and pass me while I am doing 80 through 2 lane construction zones, literally happened a couple months ago as I was driving to O’Hare for an overnight flight

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            A long, long time ago, I used to drive from Kenosha, WI, to Wilmette (and later Northfield), IL, for work, down I-94, in a 1986 Honda CRX. Up until about Tower Rd., I was doing 105MPH every day, and people were passing me like nothing.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        thats honestly a problem that can be solved with a small turbocharger and a slightly higher msrp, its not like they are ever getting close to the price of one of the huge ones.

    • MeatStiq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Here in the states we have legal corruption lobbyists which the auto manufacturers pay to keep cheap vehicles from being used. And then the lawmakers claim safety concerns as the reason.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They’re not really safe. They are generally front heavy, so there is a risk of rolling forward, no crumple zone safety stuff, more often than not the front suspension is under the seat and if that breaks it would shoot up into the cabin, and on top of everything they are pretty slow. They have more in common with an off road Polaris than a traditional truck, which is to be expected because they were mostly designed to be farm trucks. I’d much rather be in an older s10 than a kei truck in the event of a crash (and s10’s aren’t very safe). I think I lot of why they are so popular these days is because there aren’t really any light trucks anymore, and these are an alternative.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’d still own one if they were just banned on highways. The risk is probably pretty low on low speed city streets, where these would be most useful.

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I actually considered it when I last looked for a new vehicle but besides being too expensive for what they are ($10k for a 90s cheap truck) they made a lot of compromises on them. For instance, on most the struts and springs are right under the seats, so if that breaks it would come right up into your legs. If the truck is rusty and going over bumps, that is a non zero possibility.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        We should take a step back: why do we need all those safety standards in the first place? The reason is that we have such gigantic vehicles in the first place, and smaller ones simply cannot be safe on the same road. Level that all down and suddenly Kei cars are as safe as they need to be.

        • TAG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          The problem is not even big trucks. It is medium speed collisions with barriers. Kei trucks typically don’t have air bags or a crumple zone. They are designed for low speed driving on open roads.

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Not really. I compared it to an older Chevy s10 for a reason. Those were relatively small trucks that, while not always the most reliable, are still a pretty decent option for most people. Kei trucks are a smidge smaller, but are better on gas and frankly less safe. I don’t think this is a “get rid of bigger vehicles and this goes away” but of a “Kei trucks aren’t really any safer than an off-road golf cart and current regulations allows them on the road”. We need the safety regulations so less people die on Auto accidents, and kei trucks don’t really have to comply with even the basic ones.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I wrapped a 2017 SUV around a telephone pole and didn’t get a scratch. It’s not all about other cars.

    • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Where exactly are these legal in Europe? I’ve never seen one, we have small-ish trucks (that get bigger every iteration) but not this tiny, that I know of. Pretty sure they’re not legal in my country at least.

        • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          No I didn’t, they might be everywhere but they aren’t very common (maybe in Italy…). I’ve seen the other small plagio truck (because that Ape is not a truck, barely a bit more than a scooter), but only a handful and it’s been like ten years since the last I saw, and they aren’t as small as these kei trucks (these are as long as a fiat 500).

        • baru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You don’t know the Ape? It’s really everywhere in Europe.

          I haven’t seen those in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany except maybe once in 5 years. Further, it’s seems not comparable. In Netherlands it likely wouldn’t be considered a car. It likely would fall under the max 45 kmh regulations.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re definitely legal, they’re just not sold. I’ve seen them, but they’re generally sold by importer companies that sell JDM vehicles. A business in my area has a fleet of kei pickups

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      They don’t meet the us safety standards. It could mean a lot of things like lacking 5mph bumpers, air bags, abs, etc.

      Doesn’t mean they aren’t safe.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Doesn’t mean they aren’t safe.

        At just 31MPH a Kei truck gets absolutely clobbered in front offset and side impact safety tests, even against small vehicles like Smart Cars and the old (small) Ford Rangers. Like don’t bother calling an ambulance just the morgue kind of clobbered.

        Kei trucks are neat vehicles and I’d like to have one but scientific testing shows that they are not safe.

        • Mmrnmhrm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          yet people are killed / injured on european road at much smaller rate than in the US. the best US state is less safe than even the worst canadian province (and canada isnt even good). the US treats its roads like a car crash derby so it needs “higher standards”, but that approach is provably terrible. not only vehicules are huge and wasteful, but the roads remain horribly unsafe as well.

        • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just because a vehicle doesn’t meet us safety standards doesn’t mean they aren’t safe. It also doesn’t mean they are safe.

          Also, aren’t these all 25 years old or older? Safety expectations should be lower.

    • childOfMagenta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      For the hero image, that could possibly just be an attempt at a “fun” way of showing that they can carry a lot by mean of hyperbole.

      “Look at that tiny truck, it’s bursting with boxes!”

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Different crash standards in US and Europe. Most companies don’t even bother getting cars tested (designed?) in both because the market demands are so different.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      European road safety regulations are significantly weaker than those in the US and Canada.