• Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      183
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, it’s not all electric, some of the train is just regular matter

    • Thrashy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I did a little digging and it seems like there’s a tiny kernel of fact at the core of this giant turd of a hype-piece, and that is the fact that they electrified this little spur line from Berlin to the new German Tesla factory by using a battery-electric trainset. Which is not a terrible solution for electrifying a very short branch line that presumably doesn’t need frequent all-day service, even if it’s a bit of a janky approach compared to overhead lines. But hand that off to the overworked, underpaid twenty-two-year old gig worker they’ve got doing “editing” at Yahoo for two bucks an article, and I guess it turns into “world-first electric wonder train amazes!”

      For a second, though, I read the headline and wondered if Musk and co. had finally looped all the way around to reinventing commuter rail from first principles after all these years of trying to “disrupt” it with bullshit ideas like Hyperloop and Tunnels, But Dumber.

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        I guess if by a kernel of truth you mean an existing train was used on an existing track, then you could almost make it make sense? But since all of this existed before, it’s just a lie.

        I’ll also point out that anybody introducing battery electric trains instead of just electrifying the remaining parts of rail is making an astoundingly bad choice, but that’s almost certainly Germany and not Tesla.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I could see why they would do it specifically in this case.

          There’s been huge protests against building the Gigafactory in Brandenburg, and the main instrument of the opponents was using Germany’s strict environmental protection laws against it.
          If they needed to cut down more trees along the tracks to electrify the line, the opponents could possibly delay that by suing in court, demanding studies be done, maybe finding an endangered ant species somewhere in the area.

          Running the train on batteries avoids that.

          • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            They could have just illegally cut down the trees like they illegally used too much water, or any of the other things they did against their agreement with the government.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think you realise how expensive electrifying a line can be, it can be as expensive as building it in the first place. Whereas this technology can be used without modifying the track at all.

          If the line only runs a few times a day, it’s an obvious choice.

          • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I do realize. I also realize things like weight of the train, cost of the battery packs, the fact those packs will wear and need to be replaced faster than anything else in the system, and much more.

      • Quik@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly, I’d be more than happy if they just invented regular trains (even if their version would probably worse in ways not even imaginable as of now), because that would mean more money in train infrastructure.

        So… yeah, you did it! You built something really cool and completely new! And don’t look over there, that’s just… copycats?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but it’s also far from new technology. Germany is mostly electrified rail, and having BE sets to bridge areas is not uncommon (in southern Germany you also get diesel electric combo units).

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yahoo! News is an aggregator like MSN (and has very few original articles), and thus the quality varies widely based on the source. Here it’s some outlet called TCD.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just checked something and it makes me wonder if they struck different deals than MSN:

          View, say, a Business Insider article on MSN, and use the share button, and it will share the article hosted on Business Insider. Do the same on Yahoo and it shares the same Yahoo News URL that you were reading it on.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not a lie! It’s technically the first thing anybody was stupid enough to name “giga train”!

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You and I both know someone somewhere was that stupid before Musk. He isn’t even original in what an idiot he is. 😆