By this logic, if there’s a law somewhere that unintentionally allows them to crush orphans, they aren’t malicious to do so.

That’s not logic, that’s a logical fallacy:

False equivalence

A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called “comparing apples and oranges.”

or in this case, comparing a copyright claim to mass child murder… also…

Apple and other corporations lobby for this kind of crappy IP law, so they can sue people.

prove that Apple lobbied the Swiss government for this law or for a favorable outcome. I’m pretty confident that you can’t, and that you’re making up this claim because you can’t make an argument without fabricating claims

Apple expanded into this market recently…

Apple products have been available for purchase in Switzerland for decades.

…and are pretending to be the incumbent apple themed brand in that space in the whole world.

i don’t think you know what the word “incumbent” means, but you not liking apple or the fact that they’re prolific or popular is not tantamount to a crime. it’s pretty entitled to claim that your personal opinion should have any bearing on the legality of another person’s or company’s actions.