I happened to click a link that took me to the associated twitter X account for something I was interested in and was greeted by not one, not two, but four modern day web popups.

I know it’s nothing new. I’ve got a couple of firefox plugins that are usually quite good at hiding this sort of nonsense, but I guess they failed me today (or, I shudder to think, there were even more that were blocked, and this is what got through)

What’s the worst new/not-signed-in user experience you’ve encountered recently?

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Please unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed
    (grumble, unblock, reload)

    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…
    Verify you are human
    (click)

    …spin…spin…spin…

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Privacy Pass will generate a number of random nonces that will be used as tokens

        British people making a double take

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Interesting. A quick look at the description makes me think it could help with the inconvenience problem, but probably not with the allowing javascript problem. Still, I’ll have to take a closer look. Thanks for the link.

        Edit: Turns out it requires installing a browser extension. From Cloudflare. No thanks, but I’ll give it another look if the protocol ever gets implemented by browsers.

      • Kallioapina@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Doesnt seem to work for many people (Cloudflare has stopped supporting it?), judging by reading reviews on Mozilla extension store.

    • progandy@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      … Spin … Spin … Spin …

      … Remember that you turned off your VPN

      … Turn it on

      … CF: OK, only humans use VPN, no need to show the challenge

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You forgot:

      Click all the pictures of buses.
      (clicks)

      …spin…spin…spin…

      Click all the pictures of bicycles.
      (clicks)

      …spin…spin…spin…

      Click all the pictures of traffic lights.
      (clicks)

      …spin…spin…spin…

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a very hard time believing that these companies are unaware of how auful this shit makes their webpages.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      2 months ago

      If this were a competent company, I’d say that they’re entirely aware of it and how fucking awful it is, but that there’s a mandate coming from somewhere that the page MUST include x, y and z and so they add x, y and z but usually try to at least make the site usable.

      This being Twitter, though, I’m sure it’s because a screaming man-child threw a sink at someone and told them to do it or they’ll be fired and so they did it in the most half-assed obnoxious way they could manage.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Common language used to dismiss bad decisions like this:

        • We need to track and meet our metrics for the quarter
        • Engagement for $FEATURE is down, so we have to take measures to get people to take notice
        • It’s opt-in/opt-out, so it’s the right thing to do
        • It’s only a one time thing and then the system remembers1 what the user selected
        • Only new users are affected - our power users will put up with it
        • It’s just a minor inconvenience, really
        • It’s just a website

        1 - Oh, did you turn off cookies or clear your cache? Sorry about that.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Pretty sure you just triggered every developer and/or person who had to sit through a product meeting.

          Though you missed the last bullet point: Our user surveys showed that people would actually prefer these changes

          • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Pretty sure you just triggered every developer and/or person who had to sit through a product meeting.

            NGL, I was feeling very uncomfortable myself by the end of typing said list. Is it hot in here? I need to lie down.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They know exactly. Once you create a Twitter account, consent to cookies and link your Google account (AKA give them all your data) you’ll never see these pop-ups again.

      Basically extortion.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you ever want to read anyone’s tweets somewhat chronologically or see someone’s latest tweet, you’re gonna create an account.

        Tweets as view on people’s profiles are totally scrambled (presumably to thwart LLM-feeding scrapers).

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Anyone can make a good website. It takes a real engineer to make a horrible website that people will use just enough while suffering.

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          Inspired from the quote “Any idiot can build a bridge that stands, but it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands.”

          Source: Unknown

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      I do a lot of my browsing from an iPhone 11. At least twice a day, a page will crash and reload halfway through whatever article I was trying to read. I get it’s a few generations old, but since when do you need state of the art tech to view what should be a static page.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s diminishing customer experience creep, except the company doesn’t understand what the user data means. They run A/B tests of different layouts, seeing what kind of feedback each gets to learn more about design choices and users. Each version should get its own feedback and then that data is compiled by data scientists into actionable feedback, things that can be done to improve the website in the direction the company thinks is an “improvement”.

      Twitter abandoned those data scientists with the initial layoffs. There is no one to tell them what works and what impacts the customer experience, which is why each time the internal question of “how do we open up for engagement?” they answer it the same way, “Use existing user bases by linking their account to Twitter.” The result is several login requests all looking for the same cookie.

      It’s lazy or inexperienced management. Knowing the type of person Elon hires, it’s probably both.

    • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I barely see them pop up, if they do it’s for a fraction of a second before a browser extension nukes them.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, they kinda don’t. Companies are entities made out of policies guiding how people split up objectives into smaller parts. The more people involved and the more indirect it is, the less coherent it gets

      Legal says you need one popup for compliance. Marketing or analytics say you need more users to log in. Elon wants to remind people to call it Twitter.

      By the time it filters through managers to the devs, they probably know it’ll be a horrible experience, but what are they going to do? It’s not their job. They’ll get brushed off. There might even be a compelling reason to do it in this way - with this in particular, annoying and intrusive popups are malicious compliance with the EU cookie laws. But everyone seems to be doing it this way - that’s probably what legal is going to recommend rather than interpreting the law themselves

      So the problem is the structure. If you want a hierarchy of obedient replaceable cogs, you’ve made sure no one sees the full picture

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      on top of what others have said - directing you to the app and login - it’s also likely just that teams don’t talk and make decisions that solve their local issue without too much for the whole, and then say “ugh team x solved this so inelegantly! we were forced to do our thing that wasn’t as nice!”

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    2 months ago

    I will say that the Google Auth prompt in particular is just this huge nuisance and a horrible experience. People should feel stupid for including it in their web experience.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait, how can I get rid of google auth pop-ups? I got Ublock but they still come up whenever I go to a reddit page.

        • yum@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Given how intrusive google is, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was kinda forced by them along with some other functionality

          • xtapa@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 months ago

            But it acts as a Login for the page instead of registering a new account? How would Google do that without the page owners permission?!

            • yum@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Honestly, I didn’t even know what it does until now. I get so annoyed by it that I just close it immediately after it pops up. Probably time to make a uBlock Origin filter for it I guess

        • cheddar@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t know, but I also don’t know why would anyone willingly choose this UX for their website.

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Writing sign-in and authentication can be difficult. Google handles it for you. They’ll also store all of the secret stuff that you don’t want to leak, like passwords, etc. So I can see some of the appeal for sites of a certain size, but not really Twitter.

            • cheddar@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I can understand that, and a user can also enjoy the simplicity of the process. However, I’m speaking about this very popup here. It doesn’t have to be this way. There are plenty of websites that allow you to sign in/up with Google (or another 3rd-party provider) that don’t have this problem. I see so many websites and mobile apps that make it very difficult to use them. I always wonder if anyone at the company is using their own website/app. Reddit is another great example.

              • essteeyou@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Oh right, yeah, it really irritates me. I’m sure it comes from some Growth Team experiment where the only success metric was interactions (intentional or accidental) with the box.

                Making the box increased engagement with the box, ship it!

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this was your webpage 15 years ago, you’d be almost certain that you’d been infected with malware.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      I really really do miss old school internet and feel kinda bad for people who never get to experience it. I know i sound like a cunt, and maybe it’s just nostalgia, but when the internet was bound to a computer and it was mainly “nerds” using it, it was such a better time. I remember a time where the internet was fast enough for pictures and small videos, but having your own picture somehow on the internet was witchcraft to me. Scanner, cameras who are digital whaaat? Now most of the internet is ads and pictures of people who i don’t give a shit about. People’s opinion, picture of people, fuck off bring back the time where the internet was either forums or someone’s weird website, where you only stumbled upon because you typed in a web adress i. The hopes it leads you somewhere.

      I had a girlfriend who was truly fascinated by the fact that i don’t have social media and that i’m not “on the internet” like she didn’t find me and my stupid face anywhere on the web. She was often wondering what i was doing on the internet if i don’t have social media, because that was the internet to her. Facebook, instagram, tiktok and youtube.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Whenever I get to a webpage that looks a decade old (like most recently Ventoy) I get hit with a wave of nostalgia. Yeah, it might not look great or be very responsive to my actions, but my god does it feel great to just get thebinfo you need front and center.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        She was often wondering what i was doing on the internet if i don’t have social media, because that was the internet to her

        ~ shudders ~

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There was a screenshot I once saw of a Chinese netizen’s web browser in the late-2000’s, using Internet Explorer 6 and tonnes of third-party toolbars. I think I saw it back when Digg was still a thing. We’ve now reached the age where major websites are more cluttered with notifications than a malware-infected browser was 15 years ago, and where everybody is tracking everything that you do online.

      25 years ago, we legitimately drove RealNetworks into the ground for a lot less than what we’re allowing Google, Microsoft, Meta, X, etc to get away in the modern day.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    EU: “You can’t just collect people’s data, you have to ask permission first and give people the opportunity to decline.”

    Site Developers: “Fine, but we’re going to comply in the most malicious manner possible.”

    HEY DO YOU WANT COOKIES ARE YOU SURE PLEASE HIT THE BIG BLUE BUTTON FOR COOKIES THEY ARE HELPFUL AND GOOD PLEASE GIVE COOKIES!!!

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’d be fun if the EU started policing any use of the phrase “We are required to show this dialog”.

      They’re not. They choose to show that dialog so that they can try to apply commercial tracking cookies. Anything for website function is already covered by EU laws.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There have been a couple of changes to the rule since it came into effect. Originally, the pop up could effectively occlude the “Do Not Enable Cookies” button behind a maze of “Optional” settings. The end result was a big colorful “I Consent” button and a tiny little gear button with a thousand manual checkboxes to uncheck every time you visited the site.

        The regulations were updated since. Now these annoying pop-ups at least tend to have a clearly defined “Yes, I Consent” / “No, I Do Not” at equal scale and opposite color, allowing you to bypass it without going into the weeds on a configuration screen.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s hilarious on a widescreen setup how many websites aren’t adaptive but that cookie pop-up blocks 3/4 in 5000% font size.

  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 months ago

    That screenshot looks like the old screenshots from the early browser wars with 20 toolbars stacked.