• Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well the top picture clearly doesn’t represent the 3rd phase of trials, as there wasn’t one when the COVID vaccine was mandated lol

      • freeindv@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tons of places, and Biden tried nationally but thankfully the supreme Court shut him down

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        1 year ago

        My office, for one. But you prolly mean by government. Crossing the border in Canada led to the trucker thing. To be clear, I got my third booster last month. I’m pro-vax.

        • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whenever someone just straight up lies about vaccines and the responses to vaccines, they always need to bring up how they’re all vaccinated and pro-vaccine.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nothing I said was a lie. I named two examples of vax mandates. My 24 person company in the Bay Area, where we’re dominated by liberalism (whereas I’m a leftist). And the trucker convoys as a result of a mandate to cross the border. The first, you have no way to verify or disprove (although we were so disorganized that actual proof was never sought; it was a stated policy before we came back to the office in summer of 2021. The second, you’d have to have been in a news blackout to miss. I don’t understand your comment.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Work requirements are not mandates. People at the industrial half of the place where I work (I’m in the office) have to wear safety goggles. They aren’t mandated to wear safety goggles. The government isn’t forcing them to wear safety goggles. They just have to do that as a work requirement. No one forced you to get vaccinated just like no one is forcing them to wear goggles. That doesn’t mean choices don’t have consequences.

              • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I qualified my statement as “not gov” and then followed up with a gov example. You’re arguing in bad faith. Anyway, I’m done with this thread. Hope you have a nice day.

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        59
        ·
        1 year ago

        Airplanes, trains, boats, gov employees, public service workers, private corp employees (based on gov advice - mostly office workers and sports players), all forms of healthcare workers, schools, immigrants, and military to name a few.

        But most of it has been repealed now thankfully

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          52
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wasn’t mandated enough places obviously. Your dipshit view of what freedom is gives you zero right to potentially kill people with your fucked up negligence and I’m really fucking tired of morons arguing this dumbfuckery

          • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            57
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do you think all of those places repealed their mandates?

            Was it because not having the vaccine killed people?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              42
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who “repealed” anything? Laws are repealed. This was never law. Some organizations stopped requiring it because most people aren’t this type of moron and just got the fucking vaccine, and people like you made it too difficult to continue to be required. So yeah, you sort of got your moronic wish. People of course died for it but that’s their problem right?

              • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                48
                ·
                1 year ago

                If the government mandates something, it has the same weight as a law.

                Those orgs that don’t require it anymore, didn’t drop it because “most people aren’t this type of moron and just got the fucking vaccine”

                It was because we had more data, and you have to weigh the risks.

                It’s still hard to say what the long term effects of either vaxxed or un-vaxxed will be

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  35
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If the government mandates something, it has the same weight as a law.

                  No it doesn’t. I don’t think this happened at all except with govt as an employer. You morons could just get a new job.

                  it’s hard to say

                  It’s actually very easy to say. The vaccine complication rate is near zero and not a single harebrained theory you idiots had has panned out. Try again

                  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    35
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lol, you need time to know long term effects, there still hasn’t been enough of that yet.

                    And yes, a mandate has as much weight as a law, it just depends who issued it. The only really difference in mandate vs law is how it’s initiated, but here, they hold the same weight.

                    I won’t be deleting lemmy :)

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Delete your Lemmy account. Go back to reddit and Facebook where this idiocy is at home

                • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It is stupid as fuck to worry about the “long term effects” of a vaccine but not the disease it’s vaccinating against.

                  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    17
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes, I’ve heard of long covid. But it might as well be named “mid term COVID” as it applies typically applies to anyone who continues to see symptoms past the 3-8 month mark (this varies from study to study).

                    The vaccine doesn’t prevent this either though, but does seem reduce the likelihood, slightly.

                    We still don’t know what’s going to happen in the next 5+ years to come (with covid or the vax). These things can take a while to manifest sometimes, which is partly why vaccine testing is usually so extensively long, like 5-10 years (just not in this case for some reason).

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because idiots like you spread misinformation to the point people were being assaulted over it AND simply wearing face masks

              Not having the vaccine killed and continues to kill people. Not getting the vaccine is fucking stupid

    • Nobsi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why do you need a 3rd ühase of trials in a pandemic? Do you also not wash your hands after pissing and shitting? There hasnt been a trial for that.
      Which source told you that medicine isnt safe if it doesnt get 3 trials?
      No homeopathy ever goes to trials.
      Your painkillers didnt get 3 trials.

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right because injections and washing your hands are comparable.

        The “source that told me” was a bit of critical thought and common sense. This was a vaccine with tech we’ve never used on massive populations before, pushed by political leaders, followed by media outlets and gov leaders trying to paint everyone who questions it as if they’re the worst people humanity has to offer. Ofc we need extensive trials for a vaccine like that (or any vaccine), especially when the producers of the vaccine are immune from liability.

        Do you remember what informed consent is? If you’re injecting stuff into you, without fully understanding what either the virus itself can do, or what the vaccine can do, you’re just blindly following people.

        It’s this same mentality and confusion that lead to our current opioid pandemic. Blind trust in our institutions and leaders

        • Nobsi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So your source is no source. You think you’re smarter than science. Gotcha. You apparently don’t know that mrna is in use since 2001… But youre smarter than everyone else.

          • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You asked me what source I need to want full trials for a vaccine. You have the wit of a teenager.

            mRNA hasn’t been used in a vaccine like this before.

            30 years in the scheme of things is still absolutely nothing. We had lead in our gasoline and our drinking water pipes for decades without anyone actually understanding the issue, and just trusting “it’s all safe!”

            Virus comes out and we pump out a fully produced vaccine in MONTHS. Of course it’s safe and tested fully /s

            • Nobsi@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re just proving how little your critical thinking and common sense is worth. My guy… Modern vaccines as injections are only around 100 years old. 30 years is a third to a fourth of that time. That isnt relatively new. 30 years is an eternity.
              Sars cov 1 is a thing that was succesfully vaccinated against and sars cov 2 is a variant that shares many things with 1.

              I also asked you what sources you have that support your argument that vaccines need a 3rd trial.
              You answer was “it came to me in a dream/i pulled it out of my ass” you have the wit of a sockhamster.

              Billions of people have the vaccine and a booster. It’s been more than 3 years. No long term negatives. You’re just dumb and contrarian for the sake of it.